EPA Solid Waste Rule Could Conflict With States’ Preemption

An advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) to define non-hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA) is

WIH Resource Group - Concepts and Solutions

WIH Resource Group - Concepts and Solutions

drawing fire from all sides.

The EPA has been attempting to rewrite vacated air rules on boilers and incinerators ever since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2007 vacated EPA’s boiler and incinerator maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards, along with the definition of solid waste (DSW) rule.

The court rejected EPA reclassification of some incinerators as boilers based on whether they burned waste for energy recovery. The EPA now says “any unit combusting any ’solid waste’ at all must be regulated [under the stricter section 129] as a ’solid waste incineration unit,’ regardless of the function of the combustion device.” The problem now is whether EPA’s rule should preempt existing state rules governing solid waste.

While EPA promulgates criteria for waste facility permitting programs, it is the states that implement those programs and their own laws. However, the EPA says that a federal definition is now necessary to establish MACT standards for units that combust secondary materials. Several industry associations are concerned that EPA regulations could interfere with existing state and local laws involving beneficial use determinations, renewable portfolio standards, and other energy programs.

Source: News Room

If you have any questions or would like more information on this subject, please contact us at admin@wihrg.com  or visit our websites at www.wihrg.com and www.wastesavings.net .   Also visit our daily Environmental and Transportation Blog at: http://wihresourcegroup.wordpress.com/

President Obama signs into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, H.R. 1.

Right On!

Right On!

On Tuesday, February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, H.R. 1. The bill includes a number of provisions that could have a direct impact on solid waste operations.

Tax Credit Extensions
Unlike former energy bills, H.R. 1 gives renewable energy operations three different options for how they can receive a tax credit. The bill includes an extension of the section 45 tax credits for an additional three years, making the placed-in-service date December 31, 2013. Landfill gas and waste-to-energy both qualify for this extension. The credit facilities can receive is not capped at thirty-five percent of the capital cost of the facility. LFG and WTE operations will continue to receive 1¢ per kilowatt.

A provision is included that will temporarily allow facilities to claim an investment tax credit instead of a production tax credit. Facilities that are placed online by December 31, 2013, may in lieu of the PTC, elect to claim an investment tax credit equivalent to 30 percent of the capital invested in the facility. This provision has been in place in other legislation but only applied to solar operations.

One additional provision that may prove valuable is a grant program to be run through the US Department of Treasury. This program would allow renewables eligible under Section 48 tax credits, which in this legislation now includes LFG and WTE, to receive a grant worth 30% of the capital cost of the operation. The taxpayer would be eligible to receive the grant within 60 days after the facility goes online. This will be applicable to projects brought online in 2009 or 2010 or for projects that are placed in service later than 2010, but began construction in either 2009 or 2010.

Energy Efficiency Grants
The bill allocates an additional $3.2 billion dollars to the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG). This program issues grants for a wide variety of activities including programs to increase participation and efficiency rates for recycling programs. Preference is given to projects that are the most likely to reduce energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions.

Source: United States Government

If you have any questions or would like more information on what programs may qualify for federal funding under this package, please contact  us at admin@wihrg.com.  Visit our website at www.wihrg.com and www.wastesavings.net

Pushing the Envelope on Waste Reduction and Recovery – SWANA

The Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA) developed a strategy for significantly increasing the rates of municipal solid waste reduction and recovery in North America in 2003.  Ironically, the study and recommendations largely still hold true, despite today’s economic climate.

SWANA concluded that increasing the overall reduction and recovery rate to 65 percent over a ten year period would be an ambitious goal that would require a 28 percent increase in reduction and recovery over current levels while holding per capita waste generation rates level. The document concludes with the following policy recommendations that would build upon past successes and create incentives to reduce waste and achieve higher levels of solid waste recovery:

Recommendation 1: Encourage more extensive product stewardship by product designers, manufacturers, retailers and consumers.

Recommendation 2: Expand efforts by Federal, State and Provincial governments to develop markets for recycled materials and recovered energy.

Recommendation 3: Provide financial incentives for investments in recycling, composting and the use of recycled materials.

Recommendation 4: Include waste-to-energy and conversion technologies in renewable portfolio standards and green power programs.

Recommendation 5: Encourage the recovery and use of landfill gas by reinstating federal tax credits and through renewable portfolio standards and green power programs.

Recommendation 6: Support technology transfer and research and development efforts that have the potential to significantly increase waste recovery rates, as well as work to reduce the barriers to their implementation.

Source: SWANA – For additional information, visit www.wihresourcegroup.com , www.wihrg.com , www.wastesavings.net and our Daily Environmental Blog at http://wihresourcegroup.wordpress.com/

Published in: on February 19, 2009 at 1:41 am Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

EPA report: Americans recycled or composted 33.4% of solid waste in 2007

The US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) recently completed 2007 Municipal Solid Waste Characterization Report shows Americans recycled and composted 85 million tons of the 254 million tons of total municipal solid waste produced in 2007, the last updated year.

According to the report, each person produced 4.6 pounds of trash per day, of which 1.5 pounds were recycled or composted. Recycling has increased slightly over 2006, when people recycled and composted around 82 million tons of the 251 million tons of total municipal solid waste produced.

The EPA is encouraging Americans to think about increasing their individual recycling rate over the national average of 33.4 percent. November 15, 2008 is dedicated to encouraging Americans to recycle and to buy recycled products, with more than 35 states holding special events.

According to EPA, recycling 85 billion tons of municipal solid waste in 2007 saved the energy equivalent of more than 10.7 billion gallons of gasoline and prevented the greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to 35 million passenger vehicles. EPA notes that the American recycling and reuse industry is currently a $200 billion dollar enterprise.

Source EPA.

For additional Information, visit: www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net

Garbage Biz in The Dumps

The weak economy thumps industry where trash is cash – Garbage goes as the economy goes.

And right now, that’s down: “I’ve been around and working since ’71 and I’ve seen a number of recessionary environments, but this one seems substantially worse than the others,” said Mike Sangiacomo, president and CEO of NorCal Waste.

San Francisco-based NorCal is the parent company of Sunset Scavenger and Golden Gate Disposal, which collect garbage, recyclables and compost in the city. By the end of 2008, Sangiacomo said, it was picking up 200 fewer tons of trash per day than in July 2006 in San Francisco. Half that decline came since March. Other local trash collectors report similar trends as slower business at hotels, retailers and restaurants reduces waste, the building slump cuts down on construction debris, and thriftier residents cram their trash into smaller, cheaper garbage cans.

For NorCal, less garbage equals less money. Revenue has dropped between 3 and 3.5 percent in the last three months alone, Sangiacomo said, further squeezed by a collapse in prices for the recyclables his company collects and then sells. Sangiacomo would not disclose 2008 revenue; in fiscal 2007, the company brought in $500 million.

After finishing a new recycling center at Pier 96 in August 2008, the company reduced projected revenue growth to 2 percent for its fiscal year, which began Oct. 1, 2008.

But even reduced expectations haven’t been realized, Sangiacomo said. As a result, the company is tightening its belt. NorCal, which employs 1,100 people in San Francisco and 2,200 companywide, instituted a hiring freeze in October and cut back on overtime. It’s hoping it can last without layoffs.

NorCal Waste charges commercial companies for the number of days and the amount of garbage they collect. Residents get charged by the size of their can: A small garbage can costs $18 or $19 a month, while a large garbage can earns the company $26 a month.

“We’re able to reduce routes somewhat, but not as much as you’d think,” Sangiacomo said. “Revenue is going down faster than the costs are.”

From July 2006 through December 2008, all waste, including recyclables and compost, collected by Sunset Scavenger and Golden Gate Disposal declined to 2,500 tons from 2,700 tons per day. The biggest decline came from retail businesses, followed by hotels and restaurants.

“If our occupancy goes down and the number of people showing up for events goes down, there’s going to be less waste,” said Michael Dunne, general manager of the downtown Hilton, who added that not having to put newspapers in front of unoccupied doors leads to a lot less waste generated by hotels.

While recycled materials make up an increasing percentage of that waste, commodity prices for the materials have tanked. NorCal Waste used to get more than $200 a ton for corrugated cardboard as recently as July, but in December the price dropped to about $25 a ton.

“Even though people were doing more recycling, they weren’t necessarily subscribing to a lower level of service,” Sangiacomo said. “That has now begun as people are more concerned about saving every penny they can.”

It’s the same story for Joe Garbarino, who has owned Marin Sanitary Services since 1955.

Marin Sanitary Service is collecting less trash from smaller bins throughout the North Bay. And it lost $200,000 from October through December at the indoor dump that normally accounts for 50 percent of the company’s revenue as fewer people pay to throw away larger household trash like old washers, dryers and refrigerators.

“As for people coming into the gate, normally we have 12 people in line,” Garbarino said. “We have two people right now.”

He said he has to cut back from processing material brought to the dump to five days a week from six. He might have to cut back further to four days a week, which will mean slimmer paychecks for his 240 workers, but would help him avoid layoffs.

“My most important job is to keep my men and women working,” he said. “They mean too much.”

Houston-based Waste Management Inc., which owns and operates 277 landfills and 354 waste collection sites, including some in the East Bay and on the Peninsula, declined through a spokesman to comment for this story, saying their Feb. 12 earnings report would reveal any effects of the recession on the company.

But Garbarino said of waste collection agencies: “We’re all in the same boat.”

Sangiacomo said the one bright spot in an otherwise dismal time is in the company’s composting program. He sells fertilizer the company produces out of food scraps for $10 to $12 a cubic yard to farms and wineries.

“We think there’s enough (organic material) in the San Francisco waste stream that we could double what we do,” he said. “And we believe we could sell every bit of that.”

Source: San Francisco Business Times

Published in: on February 7, 2009 at 1:33 am Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Google Launch Groundbreaking Ocean monitoring Feature

Google Inc. announced the launch of ocean in Google Earth, a new feature that enables users of Google Earth to dive beneath the water surface, explore 3D underwater terrain and browse ocean-related content contributed by leaders in ocean science and advocacy.

The new version of Google Earth also introduces Historical Imagery, a feature that enables users to virtually travel back in time through archival satellite and aerial imagery, Touring, which makes it simple to create a narrated tour in Google Earth and share it with the world and Google Mars 3D, which features hi-res imagery and terrain of the red planet. ‘With this latest version of Google Earth you can not only zoom into whatever part of our planet’s surface you wish to examine in closer detail, you can now dive into the world’s oceans that cover almost three-quarters of the planet and discover new wonders that had not been accessible in previous versions of this magical experience,’ said The Honorable Al Gore at this morning’s launch event in San Francisco. ‘Moreover, with the new historical imagery feature, you can look back in time and see for yourself the unprecedented pace of change taking place on the Earth — largely because of human influences.

For example, you can watch the melting of the largest glacier in Glacier National Park—the Grinnell Glacier—image by image, for the last decade.’ ‘In discussions about climate change, the world’s oceans are often overlooked despite being an integral part of the issue,’ said Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google. ‘About one-third of the carbon dioxide that we emit into the atmosphere ends up in the oceans. Furthermore, biodiversity loss in our oceans in the next 20-30 years will be roughly equivalent to losing an entire Amazon rainforest, but this goes unnoticed because we can’t see it. This is why today’s launch of Google Earth 5.0 is so important – it gives us an opportunity to change everyone’s perspective.’

Ocean in Google Earth combines sea floor terrain and expert content to provide users with an opportunity to explore some of the most difficult-to-reach parts of the world. Virtual travelers to Hawaii, for example, can examine underwater volcanoes, see videos about the exotic marine life of the region, read about nearby shipwrecks and contribute photos and videos of favorite surf spots. The ocean feature is on by default in the newest version of Google Earth. As users zoom in on the ocean they will see a dynamic water surface, and once they dive beneath the surface they can navigate 3D sea floor terrain. The feature includes 20 content layers, containing information contributed by the world’s leading scientists, researchers, and ocean explorers (for a full list of partners please visit http://earth.google.com/ocean/partners.html). These include: * An ‘Explore the Ocean’ layer containing photos and videos about ocean hot spots around the world contributed by over 80 individuals and organizations * A National Geographic Magazine geo-quiz and overlays from their new Atlas of the Ocean * Videos from the archives of Jacques Cousteau, featuring never-before-seen footage of historic ocean expeditions ‘What this project helped me begin to understand,’ said John Hanke, Director of Google Earth and Maps, ‘is the role the ocean plays in global climate change and the impact that humans are having on the oceans and the creatures that live in it.

It was a serious omission on our part not to include a better treatment of the oceans when we launched Google Earth, and I’m very happy that we’ve been able to address that. We now have a good substrate for publishing and exploring data about the ‘other’ two-thirds of the planet.’ The new feature was developed in close collaboration with oceanographer and National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence Sylvia Earle and an advisory council of leading ocean advocates and scientists. ‘I cannot imagine a more effective way to inspire awareness and caring for the blue heart of the planet than the new ocean in Google Earth, ‘ said Sylvia Earle. ‘For the first time, everyone from curious kids to serious researchers can see the world, the whole world, with new eyes. In a stroke, Google Earth brings life and character to the blue part of the planet, and makes obvious the many ways land, water, atmosphere and living systems connect.

Many ‘aha!’ moments are sure to come as people discover new patterns, new correlations, and countless personal discoveries while vicariously diving into the waters of the world.’ The announcement was made this morning at the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco, one of the nation’s leading institutions for scientific education and research. “Information technology is key to the work that Academy scientists and educators do, and Google Earth is a leading example of such technology,” said Dr. Greg Farrington, Executive Director of the Academy. “Ocean in Google Earth opens up a new world of opportunities to explore and educate the public about the least understood parts of our planet.” Product descriptions, visuals and more can be found at sites.pressatgoogle.com/ocean. Broadcast quality b-roll is available at www.thenewsmarket.com/google.

Source: Google.  For additional information, visit www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net and our Daily Environmental Blog at http://wihresourcegroup.wordpress.com/

Desert Eco-City to Run on Waste

Abu Dhabi, capital city of the United Arab Emirates, is building a US$22 billion zero-carbon showcase city for 50,000 residents with its power plants running on waste.

A plot of desert land will be transformed into Masdar City which will produce no waste, emit no carbon and be completed by 2016. It is an initiative by the Government of Abu Dhabi through the Mubadala Development Company (the State-run renewable energy firm).  Speaking to the Sunday Times (1 February), Masdar City head of development Khaled Awad said: ‘This will be the city of the future. Zero-carbon and run on totally renewable energy, it will be one of the first and biggest ecoclusters in the world.’ Non-organic waste will be recycled. Organic waste will be converted into fuel for power plants.

Designed by the British architect Lord Foster, the 6.5 kilometre city will be suspended on stilts 20ft above the ground, increasing air circulation and reducing the heat transferred from the hot desert floor. Overall, Masdar City will need about a quarter of the energy of a normal city of comparable size. It will be spilt into three decks that separate transport from residential and public spaces and cars will not be allowed anywhere.  Water will be drawn from dew and a solar-powered desalination plant and electricity will be generated from solar power.

In total the city will cost $22 billion.  The city will be built with 100% scrap metal, and carbon emissions from building equipment and vehicles will be offset. Masdar chief executive Sultan Al Jaber said he wants to convert the emirate, one of the world’s most profligate energy-using petro states, into a model of green technology.

Source: Material Recycling Week – MRW

For additional information, visit www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net Visit our Daily Environmental Blog at http://wihresourcegroup.wordpress.com/