National Recycling Coalition (NRC) Challenged During Current Economic Crisis

The following letter was sent to members of the National Recylcing Coalition recently:

Dear Leaders of the Recycling Organizations Council:

The National Recycling Coalition (NRC) is a long ‐ standing, effective, and credible organization. We are one among many non‐profit organizations who must respond to the challenges of the current economic environment. The global economic recession and its acute impact on the recycling community are posing unprecedented financial challenges for our organization. The Board of Directors has a fiduciary responsibility to the organization and its members to promote the financial health of NRC if it is to succeed in its mission. All of us on the Board take that responsibility seriously and are committed to a vibrant future for NRC.

Accordingly, the Board is exploring a number of strategic options that will ensure that NRC is preserved as a national, member‐based, multi‐sector, and financially viable organization, committed to its mission and directed by its guiding principles. Among the options we feel we must consider are more extensive program and event partnering, asset sharing arrangements, and the possibility of consolidation with another organization of similar mission and interests.

We will be acting expeditiously but prudently as we move forward over the coming weeks to consider and develop these alternatives. We ask your patience and seek your support in this endeavor.

As options take shape, we will keep you and the membership appropriately advised and will solicit your feedback. We will comply with all of our obligations to you for affirmation or approval of any recommendations or proposals that we d velop. On behalf of the NRC Board of Directors, David Refkin, President

Source: National Recycling Coalition (NRC)

If you have any questions about this news or general questions about our diversified consulting services, please contact us at admin@wihrg.com. Feel free to visit our websites for additional information on our services at: www.wihrg.com, www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net.

Paper Recovery Hits New High in USA According to AF&PA Survey

According to an American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA) survey released this week, the U.S. hit a record 57.4-percent paper recovery rate in 2008, up from 56 percent from 2007 totals.

The celebration at the record high was tempered, however, by sober words from the AF&PA cautioning that the economic downturn — and the drop in recovered paper prices globally — will affect recovery rates moving forward.
“It’s important that in the wake of the global recession, the resulting decline in paper demand, and the decline in value of recovered paper, that we protect both our infrastructure and personal commitment to recycling, so that we are prepared to again meet growing demand as the market rebounds,” said AF&PA President and CEO Donna Harman.

The association this week also released the 49th Annual Survey of Paper, Paperboard and Pulp Capacity, which found that paper and paperboard capacity in the U.S. slipped slightly by 0.8 percent in 2008 to 96.3 million tons, below the 1.0 percent annual rate of contraction from 2001 through 2007, but higher than 0.6 percent tightening reported last year. Altogether, paper and paperboard capacity has shrunk 7.3 percent since its 2000 peak level.

According to the survey, total paper and paperboard capacity is expected to further dip by 1.8 percent in 2009 before expanding by 0.3 percent in 2010 and 2011.

If you have any questions about this news or general questions about our diversified consulting services, please contact us at admin@wihrg.com.  Feel free to visit our websites for additional information on our services at: www.wihrg.com, www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net.

Hilo Hawaii Weighs $125 Million Waste-to-Energy Plant

HILO, Hawai’i — One of the most expensive public works projects in Big Island history was awarded to a Houston firm yesterday that has been vying to build a garbage-to-energy incinerator for the county similar to O’ahu’s H-Power plant.

The $125 million facility would be designed, built and operated by Wheelabrator Technologies Inc. and would burn about 230 tons of trash or about 40 percent of the solid waste generated on the island each day. That rubbish now goes into the Hilo landfill, which is nearly full and is expected to close in about four years.

The proposed plant would be a fraction of the size of the H-Power plant in Campbell Industrial Park, which burns about 2,000 tons of trash a day.

Under the contract awarded to Wheelabrator by Big Island Finance Director William Takaba, the incinerator would be built near the existing Hilo landfill and would be completed in about four years. It would generate about 3.5 megawatts of electricity, which is enough to power about 3,500 homes.

The contract must be approved by the Hawai’i County Council, which is expected to hold public hearings before voting.

Bobby Jean Leithead Todd, director of the county Office of Environmental Management, said she expects the council will weigh the cost of the incinerator against other options such as hauling the trash across the island to the Pu’uanahulu landfill in North Kona, sending the trash off the island on barges, or building a new landfill in the Hilo area.

“I think the issues are going to be price, and also addressing anyone’s concerns over the technology,” Leithead Todd said. “I think people here, because they have not lived with H-Power, probably have some concerns.”

Leithead Todd said the large up-front cost of the plant needs to be balanced against its potential income in a community with some of the highest electricity rates in the nation. The power produced by the plant would also reduce imports of diesel fuel by about 19,000 barrels a year, she said.

“Once we’ve paid for the facility, the fact that it produces revenue in terms of electricity sales is going to profoundly impact the bottom line,” Leithead Todd said. “It will be like H-Power has proved for Honolulu in the sense that at some point in time it starts to generate revenue because of the electricity sales.”

COSTS BROKEN DOWN

The plant would cost the county almost $18.4 million a year once it begins operations, including debt payments and operating fees of more than $7.1 million a year charged by Wheelabrator, Takaba said.

That would be partly offset by nearly $6.9 million a year the county expects to earn in electricity sales, and that income would increase if the cost of electricity goes up.

After figuring in the power production earnings, the plant would cost the county almost $11.5 million a year including debt payments, which works out to about $135 per ton of trash burned, Takaba said. By comparison, he estimated a new landfill would cost about $100 per ton.

“I think there’s probably a lot of support for the concept of taking solid waste and using it to produce electricity. I think the devil is going to be in the details,” Leithead Todd said. “People want to know what are the controls, what kinds of safeguards have you got on emissions,” she said.

She said the project is unlike old-fashioned incinerators because of today’s strict federal emission controls and said the new plant will be a cleaner source of power than diesel-fired facilities Hawai’i Electric Light Co. now uses to generate power on the Big Island.

“I think people should go to City and County (of Honolulu) and take a look at H-Power,” she said. “I think there was tremendous concern over it before it was built, and now you don’t hear much about it. There isn’t much squawking, and in fact they’re talking about expanding it. Once you build it, once you get over the initial concerns, it’s not a big deal.”

Waste Management Inc. is the parent company of Wheelabrator, which had $13.4 billion in revenue in 2006 and owns or operates 16 plants across the nation that use similar technology, according to materials provided by the company.

FEW TAKERS

The plan for a garbage-to-energy plant grew out of the Big Island’s integrated solid waste plan approved by the administration and the council, which ruled out a proposal to truck rubbish across the island to the Pu’uanahulu landfill each day, and rejected the idea of building a new landfill in Hilo.

The council in 2005 instructed Mayor Harry Kim’s administration to solicit proposals for a waste reduction facility, and the county invited companies to submit proposals for various technologies.

Leithead Todd said a limited number of companies responded because some firms don’t want to do business in an isolated place such as Hawai’i, while others concluded the county doesn’t generate enough trash to make their technologies viable.

The county also required that companies making proposals have a plant that had been operating for at least two years so county officials could study the facility.

In the end the county narrowed the choices to three waste-to-energy mass burn companies that had the required financial backing and expertise, she said. That field was narrowed to Wheelabrator last year.

If the council rejects the waste-to-energy contract, the county would reconsider options such as exporting trash off the island, trucking it to the Pu’uanahulu landfill, extending the life of the current landfill or constructing a new landfill, she said.

Source: Honolulu Advertiser

If you have any questions about this news or general questions about our diversified consulting services, please contact us at admin@wihrg.com.  Feel free to visit our websites for additional information on our services at: www.wihrg.com, www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net.

Vancouver British Columbia May Export Waste to United States

As Metro Vancouver, British Columbia Canada pursues in-region strategies for trash disposal, it’s also seeking permission to ship some garbage out of the country.

 

Metro wants to amend its Solid Waste Management Plan to allow for exporting up to 600,000 tonnes of municipal solid waste to the United States for up to five years, beginning in 2010.  Metro says exports would be an interim measure as it develops its zero-waste program and waste-to-energy plants, which some oppose over air pollution, traffic and greenhouse-gas concerns.

B.C. Environment Minister Barry Penner has voiced concerns over shipping waste out of the country. But garbage exports are already happening.

Vancouver Island’s Cowichan Valley Regional District, which takes in Duncan and Ladysmith, first shipped waste to the U.S. in 2006, when a strike in Vancouver disrupted the district’s 10-year routine of shipping garbage to the Cache Creek landfill.

“We went south and it worked out really well for us,” says Bob McDonald, CVRD’s manager of waste management. When it came time to renew a contract with Metro last year, CVRD decided instead to strike a deal with Rabanco, a Washington State landfill operator.

The cost is about the same and the carbon footprint is lower, Mr. McDonald says. Garbage is loaded on trucks, shipped by barge to Surrey and then moved by rail to Washington. (The CVRD ships about 27,000 tonnes a year to Washington. Whistler is also shipping some trash south.)

In days of heightened security concerns, it may seem bizarre that containers of garbage can move across the border. The district’s contract with Rabanco stipulates against shipping hazardous or dangerous goods, and material is checked before it’s loaded.

And as the district pays its garbage export bills, which are in the $100-per-tonne range, it keeps looking for ways to ship, and spend, less.

“We were between a rock and a hard place,” Mr. McDonald says, “and this gives us all the financial incentive in the world to reduce our waste.”

If you have any questions about this news or general questions about our diversified consulting services, please contact us at admin@wihrg.com.  Feel free to visit our websites for additional information on our services at: www.wihrg.com, www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net.

Landfills Report up to 30% Decline in Waste Volumes

Along with the stock market and the foreclosure rate, a less-heralded barometer has signaled the arrival of hard times: the landfill.

In a wasteful society that typically puts 254 million tons of unwanted stuff at the curb to be thrown away each year, landfill managers said they knew something was amiss in the economy when they saw trash levels start steadily dropping last year. Some are reporting declines of up to 30 percent.

“The trash man is the first one to know about a recession because we see it first,” said Richard Weber, manager of the Loudoun County, Va., landfill. “Circuit City’s closing, so people aren’t going there and buying those big boxes of stuff and throwing away all that Styrofoam and shrink-wrap … and whatever they were replacing.”

It’s all part of the cycle of stuff that people in the trash business said they’ve seen in every economic downturn since the end of World War II.

People don’t buy stuff, so there’s less packaging — which typically makes up one-third of all landfill trash — to toss. With a drop in demand, manufacturers make less, creating less waste.

Effects of Recession

More vacant homes and fewer people in a community mean less trash. A stagnant housing market means less construction debris. On tight budgets, people eat out less, so restaurants order less, so there’s less to throw away. Landscapers are out of work, so there’s less yard debris.

In Virginia, which takes in more out-of-state garbage than any state save one, trash professionals began noticing declines in late 2007 of 10 to 20 percent.

“And normally garbage is a pretty steady business because everybody wants to get rid of it,” said Richard Doucette, a waste-program manager with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Now, he said, some landfills are laying off workers.

Ben Boxer, spokesman for Fairfax County’s solid-waste-management program, said the economy also is forcing people to heed the environmentalists’ mantra: Reduce! Reuse! Recycle! Repair!

“A lot of these things that people throw away do have a valuable second life,” he said, “especially for those who, now more than ever, are going to be facing difficult times.”

In better times, Boxer has seen usable sofas crammed into garbage bins. But now, instead of ending up at the dump, stuff is being repaired and kept or traded on Web sites such as Freecycle.org, where up to 70,000 people a week have been registering to swap stuff since the recession officially began in the fall.

Rethinking Stuff

Americans might not be saving string and rubber bands like their grandparents did during the Great Depression. But as the recession drags on, they are rethinking the way they use their plentiful stuff.

Auto repair. Appliance repair. Computer repair. Many such providers are reporting steady, if not increasing, business. “Right now, I have broken machinery everywhere,” said Brian McElroy, a shop manager at Friendly Computers in Herndon, Va. “Some machines are on the verge of being boat anchors; they should throw them away instead of fix them.”

In better times, Americans do toss them. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says 2 million tons of tech trash winds up in landfills each year, as do 100 million cellphones.

It comes as no surprise to economists that during recessions, consumers — whose spending drives 70 percent of the U.S. economy — choose to repair their stuff instead of throw it away.

Louis Johnston, an economist at the College of St. Benedict in Collegeville, Minn., combed through Commerce Department data and found that during recessions, people tend to spend 5 percent of their household budgets on repairs.

In good times, repair spending falls, in recent years to below 1 percent. “People need to know what the future’s going to look like in order to plan for it,” Johnston said. “The more uncertain it is, the more likely people are to just stop or walk in place.”

That dictum might be seen most clearly with the stuff we wear. Retail sales have fallen or remained flat for the past five months. People aren’t buying new clothes or donating their old ones.

Sales are up at Goodwill’s nine Washington D.C. area thrift stores — 52 percent in January — but donations have fallen so much that the charity has been forced to advertise for them for the first time.

People aren’t throwing clothes away, either. The EPA says Americans discarded 7 million tons of clothing and footwear in 2007.

But this year, more people are following Cathy Willis’ example. Willis had a trunk of old sweaters and chose to “update” them instead of tossing them, donating them or buying something new.

She found Elinor Coleman, an expert “rebuttoner,” and on a recent day the two huddled over a pile of sweaters and scads of vintage buttons to re-imagine her wardrobe.

Will the reuse and repair trend last in our throwaway society?

Julia Bovey, spokeswoman for the Natural Resources Defense Council, said yes. “I think we’re seeing a change in culture.”

However, Chaz Miller, director of state programs for the National Solid Wastes Management Association, predicted that once good times roll again, so will the garbage. “We, as individuals, tend to be very acquisitive,” he said.

The most lasting change to the waste stream — manufacturers cutting down on packaging — was under way before the recession, he said, and will stick because it saves companies money.

Wal-Mart has promised to cut packaging by 5 percent. Amazon, McDonald’s, Heinz and Coca-Cola all have redesigned products and packaging to reduce waste. Cadbury has come out with chocolate eco-eggs to reduce the amount of plastic used in packaging every year by more than 200 tons.

Trash Facts

In 2007, according to the EPA, Americans produced 254.1 million tons of household trash. Of that, by weight:

 

  • Paper and paperboard (packaging): 32.7 percent
  • Yard trimmings: 12.8 percent
  • Food scraps: 12.5 percent
  • Plastics: 12.1 percent
  • Metals: 8.2 percent
  • Rubber, leather and textiles: 7.6 percent
  • Wood: 5.6 percent
  • Glass: 5.3 percent
  • Other: 3.2 percent

 

63.3 million tons of trash were recycled; 21.7 million tons composted; 31.9 million tons burned. The rest, 137.2 million tons, wound up in landfills.

 

There are 1,794 landfills in the United States, down from 20,000 in the early 1970s. The EPA estimates they will be full in 20 years.

 

Between Thanksgiving and the new year, environmentalists said, Americans typically throw away up to 5 million extra tons of trash, thought to be mainly wrapping paper and shopping bags.

 

Source:  The Seattle Times Company

 

If you have any questions about this news or general questions about our diversified consulting services, please contact us at admin@wihrg.com.  Feel free to visit our websites for additional information on our services at: www.wihrg.com, www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net.

Brooklyn’s Trash Rides the Rails

The city has taken a new step in environmental management by exporting North Brooklyn’s residential and municipal solid waste by rail instead of by truck, Mayor Bloomberg announced Tuesday.

The trash will be trucked from the Sanitation Department’s existing Varick Avenue I station, which has been redesigned to allow containers to be transferred onto trains. From there, the trash trains will proceed east over the New York and Atlantic’s Bushwick freight line to the Fresh Pond Yard in Queens, where the cars will be transferred to CSX trains heading over the Hell Gate Bridge, then south through to the landfills of Virginia.

The new plan, which adds a maximum of 12 freight cars a day to the New York and Atlantic, is part of the city’s Solid Waste Management Plan.

“By exporting 950 tons of residential and municipal waste per day by rail, we’re eliminating more than 40 long-haul tractor trailer trips each day – or about 13,000 trips per year,” said Mayor Bloomberg. “That’s not only going to help reduce congestion on the borough’s streets and highways, it also will reduce the city’s greenhouse gas emissions and improve the air we breathe – especially in communities that have long been unjustly saddled with handling other people’s waste.”

Residents of Williamsburg, Bushwick and Greenpoint have long complained about parades of trucks clogging the streets of their neighborhoods at all hours, heading for waste processing facilities.

“For too long Community Board 1 has been burdened with a disproportionate amount of the city’s waste and has suffered with truck traffic, deplorable street conditions and high noise and air pollution,” said Councilwoman Diana Reyna. “Waste by rail will assist in alleviating this inconvenience and is a step in the right direction in moving forward with a more environmentally just Solid Waste Management Plan.”

Six days per week, the Varick Avenue I transfer station will receive an average of 950 tons of waste per day from Brooklyn Community Boards 1, 3, 4 and 5. Waste will be loaded into the aforementioned containers, each holding approximately 18 tons. The containers in turn will be loaded onto freight cars.

Paul Victor, president of the New York and Atlantic, says the Bushwick line already handles a variety of freight, from building materials to flour to beer. Most of this freight, however, is inbound, or traveling east from the Bushwick freight terminal. The trash cars, on the other hand, will be outbound.

The Bushwick freight line, which dates to the 19th century, once handled both passengers and freight, but passenger service ended in the 1920s, a victim of competition from subways, trolleys and cars. For a view of the branch, the Forgotten New York web site (www.forgotten-ny.com) has a page on the line.

The New York and Atlantic leases both the Bushwick line and another Brooklyn freight line, the Bay Ridge line, from the Long Island Railroad.

Source:  Brookyln Daily Eagle

 

If you have any questions about this news or general questions about our diversified consulting services, please contact us at admin@wihrg.com.  Feel free to visit our websites for additional information on our services at: www.wihrg.com, www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net.

The Seven Pillars of a ‘Green’ Corporate Strategy

Corporate leaders across all industries now face growing pressures to become more sensitive to their companies’ energy consumption and environmental impact.

Source:  Environmental Leader

 

If you have any questions about what’s in the bill, the current recycling markets, or general questions about our diversified consulting services, please contact us at admin@wihrg.com.  Feel free to visit our websites for additional information on our services at: www.wihrg.com, www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net.

While environmental concerns may start with the CEO, they quickly filter down to other C-suite executives and line-of-business leaders, who are being asked to quantify and reduce corporate energy use and environmental footprints, streamline supply chains, meet regulatory requirements and modify IT departments to drive more energy-efficient operations.

These activities are not merely environmentally responsible: they can also drive cost savings–another universal corporate mandate. For example, according to IBM’s projections, $1 in energy savings can often drive an additional $6 to $8 in operational savings. In addition, “green” policies can provide competitive differentiation.
To develop policies that are both good for the planet and good for business, corporate leaders must consider questions such as:

  • Are all aspects of our business, including operations, IT and product lifecycle management, efficient and protective of the environment?
  • As part of our overall strategy to increase business efficiency, are we considering that environmental stewardship and energy consumption are new business barometers?
  • Does our organization maintain a public commitment to meaningful and achievable goals, with transparency in reporting progress in meeting those goals?
  • Are we taking a leadership position in driving energy conservation and environmental stewardship through the value chain and across our industry?
  • Do we have a strategy that supports reducing costs, lowering complexity, and increasing operating and energy efficiency?
  • Are we looking for ways to improve IT operations to generate more computing performance without increasing power consumption?
  • Are we experiencing social and regulatory pressure and responding with verifiable energy conservation initiatives that proactively address energy and climate challenges?
  • Are we pursuing the development of energy and environmental strategies and policies to improve business and brand position?

Each of these issues can seem complicated when considered individually and perhaps overwhelming when viewed as an interrelated group. They require a framework that helps identify and prioritize environmental efforts by illustrating how problems and opportunities can be broken down into distinct areas and then segmented into manageable projects to be addressed. These projects can be joined to form a cross-organizational program managing energy and environmental issues.

Building a framework

This framework must address the needs of various executives in developing and implementing energy and environment strategies: the CEO’s need to respond to customer, government and employee expectations; the CFO’s need to deal with changing cost dynamics for energy; COO’s and line-of-business’ needs to design and implement new processes; and, the CIO’s need to increase computing power while managing energy consumption.

Overall, this framework must cover seven business components: strategy, people, information, product, IT, property and business operations. These components are common to virtually any enterprise or organization dealing with energy and environment issues.

Strategy
The creation of an enterprise-wide energy and environment strategy as part of an overarching corporate social responsibility plan can help companies address “green” issues, resulting in improved financial and environmental outcomes. Issues to be considered include the alignment of a company’s environmental strategy into an overall business strategy and how environmental values may be translated into an improved brand image.

People
The impact of employee behaviors and policies on the environment is significant. Commute time and business travel form a large part of an individual’s carbon footprint. The use of online collaboration tools and policies that support reduction in commuting and traveling can also have an impact on costs. Companies also are discovering that their environmental policies and practices can impact their ability to attract and retain top talent.

Information
With data compounding between 35 percent and 70 percent annually in some industries, it’s critical for companies to better manage their data infrastructures. Optimized collection, analysis, tiering and storage of key information helps companies comply with reporting mandates while minimizing their data footprints. These same information strategies improve business operations by improving information access and system response. They help reduce storage needs through sharing, elimination of redundancies and compression.

Product
As companies begin to understand the environmental impact of their products or services across the entire product lifecycle, they can design products in a manner that has a lower environmental impact. Streamlining product development and manufacturing also means less material used, less waste created and less energy consumed. Concurrently, an examination of the product or service lifecycle often helps businesses find and exploit market opportunities. Finally, the need to reduce energy consumption is driving an increase in the energy-management intelligence built into certain products.

Information Technology
Information technology is putting increasing levels of stress on power and cooling infrastructures. According to IBM estimates, IT kilowatt-hour usage has increased fivefold in the past five years. This IT-related energy use contributes to the establishment’s greenhouse gas emissions. CIOs and IT managers view this situation as an economic and environmental crisis.

Corporations need IT energy efficiency strategies designed to help them focus their efforts. A thorough understanding of IT energy consumption, operations and constraints is the foundation for improvement. From this foundation, companies can devise strategies to help them improve IT efficiency and resiliency, address emissions, reduce energy costs and measure their success against business goals.

Property
Companies need to reduce the cost and greenhouse gas emissions of their physical assets-from office buildings to truck fleets. The process starts with determining and managing the environmental impact of physical assets and properly maintaining all property for energy-efficient operations and reduced environmental impact. Through improved maintenance and through improved tracking, deployment, location, and management of facilities and properties, reductions in environmental impact can be achieved.

Business operations

Corporations need to transform business processes to reduce environmental impact for operations end-to-end. Consider energy or water consumption, as a start. Understanding and controlling these costs can be achieved only once a company measures its existing use and compares it against conservation benchmarks. Through the use of “smart” systems, dramatic efficiency improvement can take place. Any transformation plan put into place must be communicated to key stakeholders.

Addressing any of those seven key components of a business can tangibly lower a company’s energy usage and reduce its environmental impact. Addressing them in combination, however, can dramatically amplify those effects in making a company more competitive, successful and social responsible.

Analysis Report: The Effects That the Stimulus Bill will Have on the Recycling Industry

Resource Recycling magazine has done an excellent job in pulling together information on the recent stimulus package and how it may impact the recycling community. For your use, we are attaching Resource Recycling’s correspondence to us which contains the link to the stimulus information as well as an offer for your consideration. 

As everyone is evidently aware of, the recycling industry is enduring many hardships because of the global economic downturn, the most notable being the marketability of the commodities collected everyday in our communities.

 

Overcoming the recession will be a monumental task, and the federal government is optimistic that its $787 billion economic stimulus package will provide much of the help needed to get many of this nation’s industries back on their feet and thriving again. In fact, the recycling industry is one of those industries directly affected by this sweeping response.

 

To help make sense of what effects the stimulus bill will have on the recycling industry, the editorial staff of Resource Recycling analyzed the package and developed a guide that will appear in the March issue of Resource Recycling.  

 

An advance copy of the article can be found at the following link:

 

http://www.resource-recycling.com/images/e-newsletterimages/Stimulus0309rr.pdf

 

We want to make sure that our friends in the recycling industry make the most out of this tremendous opportunity, and, as a result, we’re inviting you to pass along this useful information to members of your association, along with a link to a free subscription to Resource Recycling magazine, available here:

 

http://www.resource-recycling.com/subscriptions/renewal.html

 

In addition to new federal investments in recycling, through money allocated for sustainability and green industry grants, billions of federal dollars are expected to be allocated for infrastructure and transportation projects, increasing the demand for certain recycled products. On top of that, as many as 25 projects listed within the U.S. Conference of Mayors’ MainStreet Economic Recovery Report involve the expansion or construction of materials recovery facilities, as well as other projects pertinent to the recycling industry.

 

Source:  Resource Recycling Magazine

 

If you have any questions about what’s in the bill, the current recycling markets, or general questions about our diversified consulting services, please contact us at admin@wihrg.com.  Feel free to visit our websites for additional information on our services at: www.wihrg.com, www.wihresourcegroup.com and www.wastesavings.net.

Bill Gates Keeps On Buying Republic Services Inc. via Cascade Investment LLC

Republic Services Inc. is a leading provider of services in the domestic non-hazardous solid waste industry.  They provide non-hazardous solid waste collection services for commercial industrial municipal and residential customers through their collection companies. They also own or operate transfer stations and solid waste landfills.

Just in case you also wonder who Cascade Investment LLC is, it is Bill Gates’s personal account (joint account with Melinda Gates), managed by Michael Larson. I guess we could call Michael Larson the Guru.  But Bill Gates is the man behind the money, and he is more famous and generate more interest.  Bill Gates has been buying Republic Services Inc. almost every week, half a million each day. How many shares does RSG have outstanding? 182 million.

And how many shares does Bill Gates own already? 35 million (19%) as of December 31, 2008.  As of March 3, Bill Gates owns more than 57 million shares or 31.42%. Bill Gates is adding to his position very frequently. Last week, when RSG reported a fourth-quarter loss of $131.7 million on Friday due to impairment and restructuring charges related to the merging with Allied Waste Industries Inc., stock price tumbled. But Bill Gates came back, bought more than 1.1 million shares this week.

For information on WIH Resource Group’s diversified client-specific solutions, visit www.wihrg.com and www.wastesavings.net.  Also, visit our daily environmental blog at http://wihresourcegroup.wordpress.com/

Western States May Reform Waste Management

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), a movement to improve product design by altering the financing paradigm for recycling and waste disposal, is picking up steam as California, Oregon and Canada have recently introduced framework EPR legislation. Also known as product stewardship, EPR essentially attempts to incorporate product lifestyle impacts into pricing, including paying for what happens after a consumer is done with the product. According to a press release from the Product Policy Institute, a framework approach allows a single law to establish EPR as policy while giving state government the authority to address multiple products over time.

Here are some of the recent legislative measures regarding EPR: On Feb. 12, the California Product Stewardship Act, AB 283, was introduced. It is based on framework EPR policy adopted by the California Integrated Waste Management Board in January 2008. On Feb. 18, the Canada-wide Action Plan for Extended Producer Responsibility was released for public comment by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment’s Extended Producer Responsibility Task Group. The plan includes a strategy for sustainable packaging. On Feb. 26, an Oregon House Bill was introduced by the House Environment and Water Committee.

The Product Stewardship Framework bill targets mercury-containing light bulbs and rechargeable batteries. The state Environmental Quality Commission would adopt recommendations to the legislative body for future products. A companion bill is expected to be forthcoming in the state Senate.

Source:  Environmental Leader

For additional information on WIH Resource Group’s diversified client-specific solutions, visit www.wihrg.com and www.wastesavings.net.  Also, visit our daily environmental blog at http://wihresourcegroup.wordpress.com/